[Imc-uk-features] hidden article 372 403

[euan2000 at onetel.com]

Its a very good report, with very good pics

u.n.

Quoting mini mouse <mini_mouse at riseup.net>:

> It's one word in an otherwise excellent report and imho it should be
> up on the newswire. Given the choice I know Guy would prefer one word
> to be changed than the whole thing to be hidden - as a working
> photographer he'll be more than used to editorial decisions going
> against him and he'll be more pissed off by the debate than the word
> substitution.
>
> I don't really care what the word should be changed to, but I think
> someone - probably Genny since she hid it - should just unhide it
> asap.
>
> mm
>
>
>
> At 6:05 pm +0100 4/6/07, freethepeeps at aktivix.org wrote:
>> Quoting mini mouse <mini_mouse at riseup.net>:
>>
>>>  I doubt Guy is going to be too happy about all this, being in the
>>>  middle of flying masonry and all that.
>>
>> I doubt many people are happy when their posts are hidden - we 
>> obviously can't
>> start editing posts without consent, and I agree that the word is
>> offensive and
>> breaches the guideline. I support the decision to hide it until the
>> problem can
>> be rectified.
>>
>> best
>>
>> ftp
>>
>> --
>> Indymedia United Kollektives editorial: features and wire moderation
>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features
>
>
> --
> Indymedia United Kollektives editorial: features and wire moderation
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features
>