[Imc-uk-features] hidden article 372 403

[mini mouse]

It's one word in an otherwise excellent report and imho it should be 
up on the newswire. Given the choice I know Guy would prefer one word 
to be changed than the whole thing to be hidden - as a working 
photographer he'll be more than used to editorial decisions going 
against him and he'll be more pissed off by the debate than the word 
substitution.

I don't really care what the word should be changed to, but I think 
someone - probably Genny since she hid it - should just unhide it 
asap.

mm



At 6:05 pm +0100 4/6/07, freethepeeps at aktivix.org wrote:
>Quoting mini mouse <mini_mouse at riseup.net>:
>
>>  I doubt Guy is going to be too happy about all this, being in the
>>  middle of flying masonry and all that.
>
>I doubt many people are happy when their posts are hidden - we obviously can't
>start editing posts without consent, and I agree that the word is 
>offensive and
>breaches the guideline. I support the decision to hide it until the 
>problem can
>be rectified.
>
>best
>
>ftp
>
>--
>Indymedia United Kollektives editorial: features and wire moderation
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features