[Imc-uk-features] NHS feature proposal, was Re: NHS Privatisation feature?
shiar at riseup.net
Wed Mar 7 04:59:54 PST 2007
On Wed, March 7, 2007 4:01 am, yossarian wrote:
> GarconDuMonde wrote:
>> looks great, although i'm not sure it's necessary to include all the
>> previous features if a link to the health topic page is there.
> This is a good point, which maybe could be applied more generally - if
> most features linked explicitly to the topic *sections* rather than (or in
> addition to) specific articles, maybe people would visit them more, and we
> could get more admins to take care of specific topics?
TBH I did that cos i didn't have time to do a proper content. The first 2
features linked to are especially good as they give extended in-depth
background to the issue. So, i'd rather at least keep those two.
More generally, yes, i agree that we should encourage people to visit
topic pages more. But the point of features is that they collect and link
things together for readers who don't have time or can't be arsed to go
through the archives for themselves. So when someone includes certain
links in their feature, that means, in most cases, they want people to
read these articles/features to put things into context. That's what I do
More information about the IMC-UK-Features