[Imc-uk-features] hiding comments

[Ilyan]

Thanks for the news about the clickable link.   I saw no mention of that 
on the pages.

When there are obvious missing comments without a link, does that 
indicate cracker action, or as I suspect in some serial hides, that the 
moderator has been swamped.   

Indycymru was indeed a different outfit.  The Techie said it had its 
database scrambled, he attributed it to sabotage.   That occurred some 
weeks after an application went in to new-imc.    A acceptance or 
rejection is still awaited.     

Ilyan


freethepeeps at aktivix.org wrote:
> Quoting Ilyan <ac.thomas at ntlworld.com>:
>
>   
>> There was no guide to see hidden comments that I could see in the 
>> Guidelines.  Hidden comments were not included in view all posts viewings. 
> Well, there must be something wrong with your computer.... Heres an example:
>
> Abbey Road revisited (by Latuff)
>
> Latuff | 26-03-2007 02:34 | London | World 
>
> This post is showing in the newswire. 1 comment has been hidden because it
> contradicts the Editorial Guidelines. 
>
> read more | 3 comments >>
>
> On the webpage "1 comment has been hidden" is a clickable link - and if you
> click on it it takes you to
> https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/03/366106.html?c=all
>
>
>
>   
>> On Indycymru we used to carry posts from the SWP as well as CP, they 
>> were always answered or given a warning notice about the merit of 
>> scientific Marxism and the danger of dogmatic Marxism.    We were never 
>> swamped.
>>
>> Comments from the far right caused much of the best writing on Indycymru.  
>>
>> Ilyan
>>     
>
> Afaik, indycymru was run by different people to the united kollektives - and
> therefore had a different decision making process. A direct comparison isn't
> possible.
>
>
> As for never being swamped - weren't you hacked to death?
>
>
> --
> Indymedia United Kollektives editorial: features and wire moderation
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features
>
>
>