[Imc-uk-features] creative commons

[minimouse]

That's interesting, you'd only see that if you were publishing, not  
reading...  And these dudes would never be publishing on indymedia.

I'm concerned they might have used that as a defense ("we thought we  
were allowed to use them"). The pictures in question were in two  
articles both of which had my e-mail address so they certainly  
weren't orphan images.

Until now I've stripped out the IPTC data to make the files smaller,  
I'll go back to including it I think...

mm


On 26 Nov 2007, at 14:58, Chris wrote:

> Hi
>
> On Mon 26-Nov-2007 at 10:47:51AM +0000, mini mouse wrote:
>> Can someone point me to where we have the statement on
>> the site about creative commons (or similar) or anything
>> about re-distributing material. A number of my pictures
>> of a direct action have been lifted - possibly from imc
>> - and used in a derogatory fashion by a private security
>> company.
>>
>> It's apparently not an isolated incident and I'm not up
>> for being a picture library for bastards like this.
>
> Whatever it says on the site you are the copyright owner
> of the images and have grounds to take action against
> them, if you are in the NUJ they might be able to help.
>
> I think this is still a accurate statments about where
> things are at:
>
>   https://docs.indymedia.org/view/Local/ 
> ImcUkCopyleft#Current_situation
>
> Chris
>
> -- 
> Aktivix -- Free Software for a Free World
>
> --
> Indymedia United Kollektives editorial: features and wire moderation
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features