[Imc-uk-features] Unhidden: Conspiraloons, Ravers and Peace Activists

[playscheme]

>Perhaps you or Phunkee can explain which part of the IMC guidlines I  have misread which makes this post by Danny news?:
>https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/08/379676.html 
>As far as I can make out the first paragraph is a justification by  Danny with regard to his previous posts (like anyone cares?). 

Hardly, most of my posts are either nicked from the mainstream or first-hand reports from direct actions, which I most often post under pseudonymns to avoid 'danny-baiters' but I can provide a bigger list of my DA reports than I can scroogle articles ascribed to Guidoreports. Like anyone cares.  And I actually organise and participate in them, like somebody who cares.  My point is that all journalism starts with speculation and that lately that has been smothered by too much anti-911 zeal.  I do like your phrase 'Danny-baiter' though, it is a vast improvement on paranoid wanker and it even makes for good rhyming slang.  

>The next 8 are  an attempt at engaging the frequently hidden 'Kurt Nimmo' and serial Danny-baiter 'citpecs' in a debate with a vague reference to a  conspiracy regarding Wikipedia. 

Not so, I realise Kurt is a blogger who doesn't read here but is simply reposted, and to the best of my knowledge Citpecs has never baited me before and certainly wasn't baiting me then. They were defending CIA propaganda here as free speech and I foolishly thought that was worth pointing out since Oscar Beards 'fact based article' on MI5 infiltration.  My bad.

>Finally the article finishes with promoted (but conveniently censored) corporate repost. Grassroots news anyone?

The wikiscanner is news that the SmashEDO people soon proved useful to the grassroots and had been overlooked until then. Likewise you may want to check out my PKI book post since noone has made use of that yet..  Fisks volte-face on 911 has been attacked by both sides since my post, so is obviously of interest to a few people - I mean, even if you disagree with his article, you would want to know about it so as to avoid quoting him on Iraq, Lebanon et al.

And I did say if the article bothered Guido so much then just hide it as the points I thought worth making were later remade.

As a general rebuke to all of you, my Lockerbie story has been carried here for a long time, and now it is broken in the mainstream first as up until now I was a conspiraloon.  If you can edit out my personal involvement then why still hide the original Figaro article that first confirmed what I've been saying for years - as if anyone cares.

Guido though, really, I am not even a 911er so why do you pick on me so much ?  I never slept with your wife even though Chris obviously did.  Look at the archive from a year ago, nobody slagged Chris off like I did - you could learn from my mistooks.  But then 'Everyone hates Chris'.

       
---------------------------------
 For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For Good this month.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-uk-features/attachments/20070903/d035a773/attachment.htm