[Imc-uk-features] [Imc-uk-process] Anti-Imperial Editorial Guideline?

[ilyan]

It cannot be right that fanciful garbage stands, and something based on 
reality is hidden.  

The whole objective of the US and UK is to establish a controlling 
Quisling Government in Iraq to keep the Oil flowing, and get their 
Gauleiters out.

Too much that should be answered is being hidden. 

Ilyan


Garcon du Monde wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> hi,
>
> Chris wrote:
>   
>> The thing that prompted me to think there is a need for
>> this is an editorial decision that was made yesterday,
>> this comment:
>>
>>     The actual situation
>>     03.09.2007 15:53
>>
>>     
> [text snipped]
>   
>>   https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/09/380152.html?c=all#c180335
>>
>> Was, understandably, hidden, then Ben decided to unhide it
>> and promote it as an addition to the article. I then
>> depromoted it and then after that ftp hid it again. I
>> don't think that indymedia should promote
>> pro-establishment disinformation -- there is quite enough
>> of this in the mainstream media already.
>>     
>
> i'm not so sure it is understandable. at least, i don't understand. and
> Ben seemed to disagree as well. it doesn't seem offensive and there is
> probably at very least an element of truth in it (the US game plan was
> most definitely not a good one, and quite possibly would have been a lot
> better if the british had been in command).
>
> i think it should be unhidden again.
>
> 	--gdm
>