[Imc-uk-features] Anti-Imperial Editorial Guideline?

[guidoreports at riseup.net]

With all due respect. I look at the hidden comments and postings that are
reported to this list, when I have time, like everyone else. Besides this
point made by ftp:

"The Indymedia UK website provides an interactive platform for reports
from the
struggles for a world based on freedom, cooperation, justice and solidarity,
and against environmental degradation, neoliberal exploitation, racism and
patriarchy."

That doesn't sit comfortably with the suggestion that:

"(the US game plan was
most definitely not a good one, and quite possibly would have been a lot
better if the british had been in command)."

Suggests to me that even contentious posts which cause large disscussions
fall within our existing editorial guidelines without needing to modify or
extend them.

regards

G.


> Hi
>
> With all respect you have admitted that you don't do
> moderation on the site and the only people who get to see
> how much pro-war content is posted (mostly comments) are
> people doing admin or people who follow the site via the
> viewallposts page and I think Ilyan is the only person
> who does this.
>
> Pro-war comments haven't been an issue in the past --
> mostly they get hidden, but now the fact that some admins
> are in favour of this content being on the site is a
> matter of concern, to me anyhow... I think war is a bad
> thing.
>
> Follow-up's on the matter of the editorial guidelines,
> rather than discussion of specific posts, are perhaps best
> done on the process list rather than the features list.
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Indymedia United Kollektives editorial: features and wire moderation
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features
>