[Imc-uk-features] Suggestions to move on the admin debate ahead of Notts
freethepeeps at aktivix.org
freethepeeps at aktivix.org
Fri Feb 8 02:04:46 PST 2008
Quoting maqui <maqui at syndicate.org.uk>:
>
> Also, the peeps that discussed what IMC-London sent out are much less
> in number than those subscribed on the IMC-London list, and more
> importantly, it is also a fact that some of the voices of active London
> imcistas were not represented on that mail, as they rarely attend
> meetings due to personal commitments or whatever else. This is
> unfortunate, but as far as a few of us understand it, there has always
> been in London a sort of unwritten guideline / common understanding
> that the live regular meetings are the sort of 'main decision body'
> (for lack of better words) of imc-london. A place were decisions 'can
> be taken'.
>
> Anyhows ....
>
Perhaps the 'main decision body' would like to think about whether this is as
transparent and inclusive as it should be.
IMO, at the least the email should have been floated to the London list before
being sent out in the name of the London Collective.
It would probably help those with other unavoidable commitments feel more
included......
ftp
More information about the IMC-UK-Features
mailing list