[IMC-UK-Features] feature proposal: Indymedia UK and the Atzmon-Greenstein affair

[jagmad at riseup.net]

With the benefit of hindsight I think it was a big mistake for Indy to get
mixed up with religious bigotry in the first place and publishing a
feature on it seems to be a bit like rubbing salt into the wound. The
whole thing is best forgotten as quickly as possible and get back to
realities, like State oppression, with its corporate media connivance, and
struggles against it, to name just a few.

Doug.


>
>> I guess we should allow more than the usual 24 hours
>> for this one. So,
>> unless there's a block, i will publish it on Thurs
>> evening/night.
>
> I'm pretty unhappy with it. Personally, I think it
> goes into detail to an extent that I don't really
> think is helpful.
>
> I think a general article with links so that people
> can do their own research. I'm interested to see what
> others think.
>
>> Also, in light of the responses i got, and
>> anticipation of what's gonna
>> happen on the list, and also my previous experience
>> with proposing
>> 'problematic' features in the past, i have decided
>> to propose this one
>> in an almost personal capacity rather than as
>> imc-uk-features.
>
> Tell us more about how that would work. Would it just
> be published as an article? I think that this might be
> more appropriate if you don't think that it's possible
> to accurately map the opinions of "imc-uk-features" as
> a group, which I think is going to be hard.
>
> Mick.
>
> ------------------o)------------------
> http://clearerchannel.org video distro
> http://transmission.cc/projects -metadata anyone?
>
> phone: 07913 882193
> new email : mickfuzz at clearerchannel.org
>
> --
> Indymedia United Kollektives editorial: features and wire moderation
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features
>