[IMC-UK-Features] Feature proposal: SHAC To Shakedown Financial Investors In The City
phunkee
phunkee at aktivix.org
Tue Feb 3 03:18:51 PST 2009
Hi,
I think we could do with some clarification about some of the concerns
you've articulated here.
Namely your objection to the use of 'notorious vivisectors' and
proposing what you refer to as an 'alternative phrasing' of 'animal
experimentation' as a more 'balanced view'.
You cite wikipedia as a source for 'animal experimentation', which seems
at odds with your other concern about using dubious sources. I'd
seriously reconsider whether Wikipedia's NPOV stance on any politically
contested terms are appropriate sources for Indymedia UK's middle column
features.
I also think this needs some clarification:
Garcon du Monde wrote:
''indymedia has in the past been very clear that we do not promote a
particular political ideology but instead reports on events that have
happened."
I understand this in the context of promoting reports rather than
annoucements, but if I think back to the points you made about using the
term 'notorious vivsectors' then
I think it's at odds with most of the topic pages we have that reflect
on-going struggles and are informed by ideologies.
Solid.
phunkee
More information about the IMC-UK-Features
mailing list