[IMC-UK-Features] request for feature on indmedia g giggles

[iggyp imc]

the email was sent to the list and i put the feature up. It was requested as
a feature in the original email and went through the usual process.  If
there was a problem with the request, then it should have been rasied
earlier than now. Why did you expect that nobody would do it? just cos you
didn't think it was suitable?

The feature is about a major decision next week that has had a huge amount
of campaigning behind it. It is bringing together actions and events (past
and future) that relate to a major decision on aviation. I think that this
is major news for activists.

I would prefer it to stay up.
Iggy.

2009/1/10 Jeff Parks <winjer at piombo.org>

> ben gringo wrote:
>
> > I don't see why this feature should be taken off the front page.
> > It  went through the correct process with about 36 hours for
> > people to raise issues about it.
>
> It wasn't proposed for the front page specifically, and when I first
> read it I didn't expect anybody to put it on front page, I also can't
> see what is improper about raising issues with an already published
> feature.
>
> > This is major news
>
> How is this announcement major news?
>
> l'n'r,
> Jeff
> --
> Indymedia United Kollektives editorial mid-column features
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-uk-features/attachments/20090110/7c185666/attachment.htm