[IMC-UK-Features] proposal - climate rush featureFrom: mark

[ana]

> Subject:
> Re: [IMC-UK-Features] proposal - climate rush feature
> From:
> ana <anap at riseup.net>
> Date:
> Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:42:53 +0000
> To:
> imc uk features <imc-uk-features at lists.indymedia.org>
>
> To:
> imc uk features <imc-uk-features at lists.indymedia.org>
>
>
> [message sent by mark attached, hopes it gets to the list this time]
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [IMC-UK-Features] proposal - climate rush feature
> From:
> <>
> Date:
> Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:24:46 +0000
> To:
> <imc-uk-features-bounces at lists.indymedia.org>
>
> To:
> <imc-uk-features-bounces at lists.indymedia.org>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [IMC-UK-Features] proposal - climate rush feature
> From:
> mark <mark at aktivix.org>
> Date:
> Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:24:01 +0000
> To:
> Middle column features for Indymedia UK
> <imc-uk-features at lists.indymedia.org>
>
> To:
> Middle column features for Indymedia UK
> <imc-uk-features at lists.indymedia.org>
>
>
> Good feature, and thanks to whoever ticked LeedsBradford.
>
> >>>> Photo:
> >>>> http://indymedia.org.uk/images/2009/02/423017.jpg
> >> Does it really need the "(c) http://www.ameliasmagazine.com/" caption?
> >>
>
> I have a problem with using copyrighted material on Indymedia. Some of
> our collective have been talking about banning all such restrictively
> licensed intellectual property from our region page, because we want it
> to be a 'common'. How are other collectives dealing with this?
>
> Mark
--
Indymedia United Kollektives editorial mid-column features
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features

This incoming email to UWE has been independently scanned for viruses by
McAfee anti-virus software and none were detected