[imc-uk-moderation] Comment moderation query

[Mike D]

Hi jimdog,

Are you talking about the new article? I have not seen these, please
can you describe where?

Mike

> i would also ask that comments questioning the editorial policy of
> an imc
> are removed from this thread as is the standard protocol. I agree
> that the
> article is valid news and should be left up, it is the comments
> attacking
> our moderators i object to which i believe is fair
>
>> i just want to clarify that a closed meeting means a members only
>> meeting
>> rather than an open public one. This is pretty normal for all
>> social
>> centres. Since anyone can be a member, i don't understand the
>> relevance
>>
>>> Well, its back on the
>>> wire.https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/10/439814.html?c=on#comments.
>>> I
>>> wasn't around last night - but I think that if someone is
>>> concerned
>>> about
>>> what they perceive as an injustice at a place that activists
>>> frequent,
>>> and
>>> want others to know what is going on, that it probably is news.
>>> This
>>> isn't
>>> someone complaining that they have been treated unfairly as an
>>> individual,
>>> but is someone who is concerned that an apparent abuse of process
>>> has
>>> led
>>> to a fundamental erosion of the relationship between The Common
>>> Place
>>> and
>>> part of the movement. Today's post claims that although about 40
>>> people
>>> attended the meeting last night, the matter still isn't decided -
>>> and
>>> that
>>> will take place at a 'closed meeting' on Thursday. It seems to
>>> confirm
>>> the
>>> claims on the now hidden thread.
>>>
>>> I don't think it should be hidden.
>>>
>>> ftp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> cactus at aktivix.org wrote:
>>>>> Quoting anargeek <chris at anargeek.net>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue 13-Oct-2009 at 01:37:05PM +0000, cactus at aktivix.org
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To me this is  not news is it a thought someone had with not
>>>>>>> back up
>>>>>>> argument or fact  so far.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you proposing that the article be hidden as non-news, that
>>>>>> might
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> one way to resolve this issue...?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes and maybe it should go sooner that i proposed - as it is
>>>>> serving
>>>>> no purpose.
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers tony
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Right since no-one's objected to tony's proposal, I've now
>>>> hidden the
>>>> article in question.
>>>>
>>>> Solid.
>>>>
>>>> phunkee
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> imc-uk-moderation mailing list
>>>> imc-uk-moderation at lists.indymedia.org
>>>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-moderation
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> imc-uk-moderation mailing list
>>> imc-uk-moderation at lists.indymedia.org
>>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-moderation
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> imc-uk-moderation mailing list
>> imc-uk-moderation at lists.indymedia.org
>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-moderation
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> imc-uk-moderation mailing list
> imc-uk-moderation at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-moderation
>