[Imc-uk-network] List admin policies

[Hamish]

On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 18:36 +0100, MrDemeanour wrote:
> Zak wrote:
> > Whoa... that PDF attachment was huge (2 Mb). In general, attachments
> >  shouldn't be sent to mailing lists at all,

> My own policies are actually very flexible; I'm not a net-nazi, and
> HTML-content, attachments and so on are OK with me, as long as they
> don't seem likely to cause inconvenience to list-users. Ifr it's
> HTML-only, and it comes up for moderation, I'll reject it; but if it's
> readable, the size is OK (FSVO "OK"), and it's on-topic, I won't get
> funny about my own personal rules.
> 
> But I welcome guidance from the list; I am your servant. I take silence
> from the list to mean "You're doing it the way we want it done".

I agree with the points in general, but I wouldn't want to exclude
people who are not technically minded from posting to the list.  So
having some flexibility sounds great to me.

But if there is another post with a 2 MB attachment, could a list admin
let the sender know they should resend the post without the
attachment ...

Finally thank you to the list admins for doing their stuff

Hamish

-- 
http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Main/DaMish

http://www.actionmedics.org.uk/

my public key can be found like this:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 7EFB2080
Key fingerprint = 2B97 318A 0D1B 1C70 61FA  673C 2DC0 FB25 7EFB 2080
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-uk-network/attachments/20050904/d31d3ab8/attachment.pgp