[Imc-uk-network] List admin policies
mishd at fastmail.fm
Sun Sep 4 08:29:57 PDT 2005
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 18:36 +0100, MrDemeanour wrote:
> Zak wrote:
> > Whoa... that PDF attachment was huge (2 Mb). In general, attachments
> > shouldn't be sent to mailing lists at all,
> My own policies are actually very flexible; I'm not a net-nazi, and
> HTML-content, attachments and so on are OK with me, as long as they
> don't seem likely to cause inconvenience to list-users. Ifr it's
> HTML-only, and it comes up for moderation, I'll reject it; but if it's
> readable, the size is OK (FSVO "OK"), and it's on-topic, I won't get
> funny about my own personal rules.
> But I welcome guidance from the list; I am your servant. I take silence
> from the list to mean "You're doing it the way we want it done".
I agree with the points in general, but I wouldn't want to exclude
people who are not technically minded from posting to the list. So
having some flexibility sounds great to me.
But if there is another post with a 2 MB attachment, could a list admin
let the sender know they should resend the post without the
Finally thank you to the list admins for doing their stuff
my public key can be found like this:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 7EFB2080
Key fingerprint = 2B97 318A 0D1B 1C70 61FA 673C 2DC0 FB25 7EFB 2080
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-uk-network/attachments/20050904/d31d3ab8/attachment.pgp
More information about the Imc-uk-network