[Imc-uk-process] PROPOSAL: redesign of uk site (trying to finalize)

[ilyan]

If there is major redesign underway here is a useful alteration:

"It would help the more senile contributors if MIR showed the original 
article (and even comments) on the same page as the comments are 
written. Often, referring back causes the loss of what has been written. 
So one does not take the risk of checking."

A fastidious Editor could correct the spelling mistake no one is likely 
to notice.  My comment to "The Logic of Zionism .. Welsh style" has an f 
missing, there should be two in Amddiffyn. 

Was 'The Logic..'  written by a known Troll?  -who is also the . (full 
stop)?   Someone seems not to have grasped that you cannot be 
International without Nations,  and that killing Nations is Genocide.
Regards
Ilyan

GarconDuMonde wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>hi,
>
>yossarian wrote:
>
>  
>
>>At this point I'd like to try to sort through some of the ideas to make
>>a proposal out of them.  Let's see:
>>
>>a)  Ireland/Bristol/Scotland:  Bristol and Scotland DONE by Andy,
>>Ireland not yet there.  Reading the archives, it is not clear to me that
>>there is a consensus on how to list Ireland (please point to an archive
>>post if I have missed this).
>>    
>>
>
>yep, i don't think this has been achieved yet. the best suggestion was
>to list ireland under 'neighbouring imcs' - from chekov, 25/May/05
>
>  
>
>>b) "Major reports" rather than "Actions":  DONE by Andy
>>    
>>
>
>good :-)
>
>  
>
>>c)  Radio banner which Zcat wanted:  DONE by Andy (video, cinema and
>>offline are back too).
>>    
>>
>
>good :-)
>
>  
>
>>d) Security box: still a link in the top menu.
>>    
>>
>
>:-(
>
>as chrisc said on 24/May/05 this was something that had been agreed to
>on the uk-process list a few months ago. i definitely support the
>inclusion of the security box on the front page adn would be extremely
>disappointed if it is not included. i am happy to do some more work on
>actually improving the security page, too, over the next few days...
>
>  
>
>>d) Copyleft notice: Ana proposed this, seems like a good idea but may
>>require more discussion (which license?)
>>    
>>
>
>there is a page on the wiki about UkCopyRight (or something like that -
>sorry, i'm offline at the moment). personally, i think the easiest to
>comprehend and most compatible license is the creative commons -
>http://creativecommons.org - Attribution, Non-Commercial, Sharealike
>license (unless otherwise specified, of course).
>
>  
>
>>f) New server appeal:  Is this still going? Does the wording need to be
>>changed? Mini-mouse is right, it will seem weird to have a "new server"
>>appeal at the same time we have a feature saying we've moved to a new
>>server.  Chrisc or Zapata are probably most on top of this, where is
>>this at?
>>    
>>
>
>
>Can we just change it to "server appeal" and rewrite the text a bit? i
>think it is important to keep this highlighted, though....
>
>alternatively, maybe we should have an appeal over the next few weeks
>for funds to support imc coverage of the g8: we (i hope!) will be
>getting a lot of traffic and this is definitely something that people
>might consider contributing to.
>
>* * * *
>
>ok, that's enough comments for now - just to re-emphasise the security
>box ;-) - and one final thing to say: andy, everyone has already
>expressed thanks for your work on this, i'd like to add my voice to
>that; but also - yossarian: thank you for working so hard at producing
>summaries and trying to get consensus, it's appreciated!
>
>- --
>
>love and solidarity,
>
>
>  
>