[Imc-uk-process] PROPOSAL: uk response to imc-paris proposal about imc-process moderation, including NEW PROPOSAL for imc-process and imc-communication list management

[GarconDuMonde]

hi,

Tony wrote:
> I fully support this proposal - the system works (after a long period of
> chaos) and is fair and open - if anything it forces imc'istas to consult
> locally before ranting which is alot more productive.

thanks.

> Personally, i am not into the communication list becoming what Process
> was and think it should remain  liason based aswel (as they both were
> and and this prevents flame wars that are destructive in networks) - but
> with an open remit to discuss things between imc's aswel as decissions,
> like 'we had a great party in london' etc.

i'm not sure what this means. does it mean you have some amendments to
the proposal, or are you happy as it now stands? for what it's worth,
imc-communication is currently _not_ viewed as a liaison list by anyone,
either liaisons or moderators, and i think it is working pretty well at
the moment. for example, the way the new-imc debate is ocurring with a
third person (i.e. not a moderator) providing summaries....

blah, i just woke up and not sure if that makes entire sense or not.
anyway, love and solidarity,

	--gdm