[Imc-uk-process] Re: [imc-uk-tech] More libelous comments? Newswire is hot today!
gdm at fifthhorseman.net
Tue Feb 21 03:24:56 PST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Salim Fadhley wrote:
> This article suggests [blah, blah, blah...]
yeah, but ... - i don't think we need to go looking for trouble and, as i think
[machine] pointed out, we really don't need to do anything until _after_ we are
contacted, unless it contravenes our editorial guidelines, of course. that said,
i'll reiterate the fact that:
* a "hidden" post is still libellous, as it is publicly published (on the
web) and a different colour background counts for zilch, afaik.
thus, i propose that we bring the debate of libellous posts to a public forum,
and debate the generic, rather than any specific post: we need to establish some
policy or protocol for how a (trusted, closed) group can proceed when faced with
i suggest, also, that future emails are SENT ONLY TO IMC-UK-PROCESS. thanks.
love and solidarity,
i have a NEW key:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 594B97C2
Key fingerprint = 7B70 F22D F275 D111 3A04 F9EE 0E25 4944 594B 97C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Imc-uk-process