[Imc-uk-process] SERVER PROPOSAL: the next steps

[GarconDuMonde]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi,

MrDemeanour wrote:
> Is it only the virtualisation technology known as 'VServer' that Zak and
> Chris are deprecating, or all forms of virtualisation? FWIW, my own view
> is that any kind of virtualisation around Mir would be a bad idea, and
> that Mir should be allowed to run unmolested, on a dedicated real
> machine. I.e.: keep it simple, smartass.

this was the discussion that we had earlier on irc and yes, i believe it _is_
all forms of virtualisation that zak and chris are deprecating. i understand
their reasoning and don't disagree with it.... what i would ask is, what do you
(i.e. anyone who cares to answer) actually think the minimal, optimal and
maximal requirements of mir are (or should be) in terms of processing power and
memory? and, what other variables need to be taken into consideration?

- --

http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Main/GarconDuMonde
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 594B97C2
Key fingerprint = 7B70 F22D F275 D111 3A04  F9EE 0E25 4944 594B 97C2



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Darwin)

iD4DBQFFEGcYDiVJRFlLl8IRAnVfAJUdUh2yhhL5Jc/vRZl9Dw+OBj0FAJ9ooK/u
OukiXZw/cu/3dvu0K0loFw==
=IkZl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----