[Imc-uk-process] Fwd: Re: [IMC-UK-Features] BLOCK: Feature proposal: Big changes are coming to Indymedia UK
phunkee
phunkee at aktivix.org
Sun Apr 24 04:14:08 PDT 2011
On 24/04/2011 11:56, cactus at aktivix.org wrote:
> Hello Phunkee
>
> I am not sure i understand your block:
The BLOCK still stands Tony, I suggest you and your London friends read
this account of the Bradford meeting. The account has been endorsed by
other members of the Mayday collective. I endorse it as accurate too.
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-uk-process/2011-April/0419-c6.html
> Hello
>
> I was present at the Bradford meeting and it was explicitly stated there
> that the agreement would not stand if group A (now Mayday collective)
> were not able to complete a safe passage through new-imc process in
> time. This was discussed more than once and statements were made by
> members of London imc along the lines of 'we had better make sure we
> help you get through new-imc so the fork can go ahead'. These statements
> were made both before and after the fork was agreed - in other words, it
> was agreed on this basis. As I understood it, this was not a case of
> London saying they would somehow engineer our passage through new-imc
> process, but that they would support us and help us get through as this
> would be in everyone's interests in order for the fork to proceed. This
> has not happened.
>
> If the people who made these statements thought all along that the fork
> could go ahead without group A getting through new-imc process, then the
> meeting was deliberately misled. I would not have gone along with the
> agreement on the basis that the fork would go ahead regardless and this
> was NOT what was agreed.
>
> If the minutes don't record precisely this point, then that's
> unfortunate, but it doesn't change what was said and agreed in the
> meeting. After spending a lot of time to no good effect trying to
> ensure that the minutes of the previous network meeting accurately
> reflected what happened, I had neither the time, energy nor inclination
> to do the same all over again with this meeting.
>
> cheers
>
> genny
--
Indymedia United Kollektives editorial mid-column features
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features
More information about the Imc-uk-process
mailing list