[Imc-uk] **JUNK** Re: [IMC-UK-Features] Unjustified Removal of Campaign Postings from Indymedia UK

[Garcon du Monde]

if you are concerned, you should:

1. included the url or id number of the article in question

2. check on the imc-uk-features list archive

solidarity,

	--gdm

CTJ wrote:
> Unjustified Removal of Campaign for Truth & Justice Postings from Indymedia 
> Newswire
> 
> I notice on two consecutive occasions that the Campaign's postings were 
> removed.
> There is no justification for this and as a consequence have reproduced the 
> material and posted it for all to see.
> Maybe if there is any thing untrue or derogatory contained within, somebody 
> can point it out.
> 
> Author: A. Balogun
> Position: Campaign Co-ordinator
> Organization: Campaign For Truth & Justice
> Website: http:www.ctjnet.co.uk
> E-mail: info at ctjnet.co.uk
> 
> 
> No Lawbreaker can be a Law Enforcer!
> 
> 
> 
> The judiciary of England & Wales is guilty of the most severe perversion of 
> justice imaginable and have been aided and abetted by other Public 
> Authorities, Media Organizations, Downing Street and several Members of 
> Parliament.
> 
> 
> 
> In an attempt to cover-up the death and circumstances leading up to the 
> death of a 14 month old baby, the judiciary have engaged in the criminal act 
> of false imprisonment and attempts to section and silence the victim of 
> their criminality.
> 
> 
> 
> Subjected to many years of abuse and violations of his rights guaranteed by 
> law at the hands of the Metropolitan Police Force and the Judiciary, the 
> father of the baby (Mr. Caul Grant) acting under duress and self defence 
> (when all the abuse became too much) imported 45 Kilos of Cannabis into the 
> UK, in hope he could bring the issues before twelve ordinary members of the 
> public.
> 
> 
> 
> However, at his trial in December 2003, the trial judge, Judge Pratt 
> deliberately misdirected the jury by telling them that Mr. Grant's motives 
> were completely irrelevant and that "there is no defence of justification in 
> English law".  This is despite the fact that the Defence of Justification 
> (Lawful Excuse) had been successfully used before in the UK by Greenpeace 
> activist as far back as 1999.
> 
> More contradictory is the fact that in September 2008, at Maidstone Crown 
> Court, the jury cleared six Greenpeace activist using the same defence of 
> Justification again (See Micheal McCarthy, Environment Editor, Independent 
> 11/09/2008).
> 
> Even more alarming, Judge Pratt further went on to tell the jury, that if 
> they acquit Mr. Grant "no other court or jury could stop him or convict him 
> of anything".
> 
> 
> 
> Now Mr. Caul Grant, has remained unlawfully locked up in prison for over 
> five years without having had the right of appeal against being wrongfully 
> convicted for the importation of 45 Kilos of Cannabis.
> 
> He is now being detained for a further 18 months for not being able to pay a 
> confiscation order in the sum of �85,000.00.
> 
> 
> 
> The judiciary has become judges in its own cause and therefore can not offer 
> the necessary level of fairness, impartiality and independence for justice 
> to be done.  Until or unless issues of judicial lawbreaking and corruption 
> are resolved and judicial integrity restored, beyond a reasonable doubt, all 
> matters conducted before the judiciary of England and Wales, whether civil 
> or criminal, will be unlawful, because a lawbreaker cannot be a law 
> enforcer.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Indymedia United Kollektives editorial mid-column features
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-uk-features
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-uk/attachments/20090118/8b9f3ee3/attachment.pgp