[Imc-unity] Repost of last posting
Jason Reep
jasonr@speakeasy.org
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:50:06 -0700
works well for me.
what's next?
-jason
----- Original Message -----
From: lesmarquis <lesmarquis@ziplip.com>
To: Cayce Callaway <cayce9@hotmail.com>; <imc-unity@lists.cat.org.au>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Imc-unity] Repost of last posting
> In reference to Cayce's last post
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cayce Callaway [mailto:cayce9@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001, 10:35 AM
> > To: imc-unity@lists.cat.org.au
> > Subject: Re: [Imc-unity] Repost of last posting
> >
> > Sorry Sean, I've been operating at near burn-out mode for the past
couple of
> > weeks. But you're right, I think we can make this happen if we
persevere.
> >
> > That's a tricky question and I do remember us talking about it. I'm
> > inclined to think offering that respect to some while witholding it from
> > others is too agenda laden to be a part of our basic principles.
>
> I agree
>
> I would
> > veer from that viewpoint however, when talking about police in the line
of
> > duty. When they put themselves in the position of being public
servants,
> > and despite their most common behavior that is what they're supposed to
be,
> > in my book, they give up their right to privacy.
>
> I agree
>
>
> >
> > Actually I just had another thought on the last one (#3). What if
instead
> > of listing the reasons and therefore limiting them, we say "All IMC's
> > respect the right of those who, for any reason, wish not to be
> > identified..."
>
>
> this is fine, but the rest of the statement goes into video/photos of
people in the IMC space, do we want to keep it that way or try to make it
more broad-spectrum; personally I say we leave it to the IMC space. Anything
else gets too complicated and too censorial. It can be a general
"understanding" amongst IMC's that we do not publish material incriminating
toward individuals, but as a written Principal of Unity...I don't think so.
>
>
>
> So, I'm saying what Cayce put up is looking pretty good unless any one
else may have a problem.
>
> Cheers, Sean
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> imc-unity mailing list
> imc-unity@lists.cat.org.au
> http://lists.cat.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/imc-unity
>