[IMC-Video] [Fwd: <nettime> A youtube for the activist world]

Thu Jun 14 10:44:50 UTC 2007

We need both video distribution methods:
1. low quality high compatibility / single function
2. high quality low compatibility / multi functional
*
1. to reach the general public online
2. to support the network of producers that reach people offline by
allowing exchanges of footage for screening, broadcast, etc.

Writing as a video producer with an IMC that has been asking for tech
support for four years (and counting), the simplest system, with the most
support (IMC or non-IMC), that will have the longest life time is best for
the global network.

This is not to pass judgement on our busy collective or to say we should
wait with this initiative, but rather to note that we continue to have
problems with these issues of access to technology even in the most common
denominators, and that they should also be a part of the discussion here.

Rona

On Wed, June 13, 2007 10:12 am, lotu5 wrote:
> I think that having an in browser player is probably the most important
> component. Isn't there an "indytube?" Is anyone using it?
>
>
> mark burdett wrote:
>> hi, i'm curious what are the key feature requirements of "decent video
>> support".
>>
>> we have lots of folks posting video to our local site.. although ideally
>> that number would be growing. there are a lot of folks out there who
>> dont know about it, so we try to do some outreach when we find good
>> videos on youtube.
>>
>> --mark B.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:44:31 -0700, lotu5 wrote:
>>
>>> Wow, this really shows how far behind indymedia has fallen in terms
>>> of relevance because of not having decent video support... I was at a
>>> rally yesterday at UCSD which was organized largely using facebook and
>>> where the ~100 participants were begging the people taking video to
>>> post it on youtube right after the rally...
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: <nettime> A youtube for the activist world
>>> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:24:41 +0530
>>> From: fred at bytesforall.org
>>> Reply-To: fred at bytesforall.org
>>> To: nettime-l at bbs.thing.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A YOUTUBE FOR THE ACTIVIST WORLD... ONLY MORE FAIR
>>>
>>>
>>> By Frederick Noronha
>>>
>>>
>>> Across the internet, a growing number of websites and tools are
>>> offering people a wide range of 'free beer' -- type of products. But,
>>> as far as cultural activists go, there is still a shortage of free
>>> speech tools.
>>>
>>> This is where Engagemedia.org steps in.
>>>
>>>
>>> This Australia-based collective has produced software to enable an
>>> activist network in SE Asia and the Pacific to take online a wide range
>>> of social jusice and environmental video. What's more, it wants to do
>>> so on a socially just model.
>>>
>>> Other commercial services -- like YouTube.com -- also allow you to
>>> place your video online. But there's a big difference between the two,
>>> as Anna Helme, co-founder and project manager of EngageMedia.org
>>> points out.
>>>
>>> YouTube.com's advertising revenue goes only to its shareholders --
>>> not the film-makers that created all the value for it. It only allows
>>> streaming of its video collection, and not re-distribution both on
>>> and offline. YouTube's license allows it to use your video pretty much
>>> for whatever purpose it wants to in perpetuity. It is based on a
>>> 'closed
>>> source' or proprietary software platform. And, it recently made a huge
>>>  killing from everyone's creative work when it was sold for US$1.65
>>> billion.
>>>
>>> In contrast EngageMedia.org allows videos on its site to be
>>> downloaded for redistribution. It will soon offer a donations model to
>>> channel funds back to the producer. Licenses of work on its site are
>>> based on the Creative Commons system, and the choice is left up to the
>>> producer. It is based on a Free Software platform, and there's no
>>> question of this community-based site being sold.
>>>
>>> EngageMedia.org also has a very clear-cut editorial policy. Says
>>> Anna: "We will accept work that is well researched, well produced and
>>> edited; focuses on SE Asia and Pacific; aids in development of social
>>> movements; is innovative, engaging or entertaining; and constructive,
>>>  critical or highlights key issues."
>>>
>>> "We won't accept work which promotes sexism, racism or homophobia
>>> or discriminates against dis-empowered members of the community; is
>>> advertising or advertorial," she adds.
>>>
>>> EngageMedia.org is also very clear about how its editorial control
>>> works. It is growing from a small core collective, and wants to hand
>>> over its editorial control back to the community once the community
>>> has matured. It uses an established editorial policy as a foundation
>>> for community decision-making.
>>>
>>> Incidentally, it use features of the Free Software-based Plone CMS
>>> (content management system). It describes its "publishing workflow" as
>>>  based on a submit-review-publish cycle. Community members can play
>>> the role either of member, reviewer or manager.
>>>
>>> This network has a lot of hints for campaigners and activists wanting
>>>  to place their content online, or promote it through myriad ways.
>>>
>>> It points out to possibilities for online video distribution. For
>>> this, says EngageMedia.org, one has to be aware of one's audience and
>>> thus the appropriate distribution channels to use. Likewise, one also
>>>  needs to know how to compress and upload video. Using these tools,
>>> once can promote and syndicate one's work.
>>>
>>> First of all, one needs to determine a digital distribution strategy.
>>>  Will it be based on screenings, TV, DVD, VCD or online distribution?
>>>  For this, one needs to determine the audience and how to reach them.
>>>  What are their viewing habits? Where do they go on the internet?
>>>
>>>
>>> Video-compression is a crucial issue. What is the best format
>>> and codecs to be used? (A codec is a software module capable of
>>> performing encoding and decoding on a digital data stream or signal.
>>> The word codec may be a combination of any of the
>>> following: 'Compressor-Decompressor', 'Coder-Decoder', or
>>> 'Compression/Decompression algorithm')
>>>
>>>
>>> Where does one find the appropriate encoder? How does one export
>>> a movie from the editing application, in digital video? There are other
>>> aspects one needs to also take care of such as preparing your
>>> metadata.
>>>
>>> Video-compression is an important issue. To get it right, one needs
>>> to determine the best formats and codecs to use. You need to find an
>>> appropriate encoder. Then, one needs to export movie from editing
>>> application in DV format. Compressing the video is next, followed by
>>> preparing the metadata, and finally uploading the video and the
>>> metadata to your website of choice.
>>>
>>> Anna points to a number of ways of how to syndicate and promote
>>> online any alternate video. These means range from email to blogs, RSS
>>> info feeds, RSS vodcast, peer2peer networks (including torrent
>>> trackers) and even via mobile phones.
>>>
>>> Offline ways of promotion include distribution using TV, cinema
>>> and local screenings. Then, there's the possibility of faxed-out
>>> media-releases. Interviews (to radio, print and TV are other
>>> possibilities). Promotional material needs to be created too, and
>>> shouldn't be overlooked.
>>>
>>> Why compress video files before putting it out? Compression allows
>>> you to make your video smaller for easier and faster transport on the
>>> web, or so it will fit on a disc. Roughly, in DV format, only four
>>> minutes of video will fit in one gigabyte of space. This is too big to
>>> transfer over the internet, or even put on disc. So you need to
>>> compress your video.
>>>
>>> There are varied tools with which one can compress a video.
>>>
>>>
>>> First, one needs to export the file from your non-linear editing
>>> program such as Premiere, Vegas Video, iMovie OR Final Cut.
>>>
>>> In terms of video compression tools, there are currently a number of
>>> softwares available. From the world of proprietorial software these
>>> include Cleaner, Canopus ProCoder, Quicktime Pro, Flash etc.
>>>
>>> In the case of Free/Libre and Open Source Software (or shareware),
>>> there's Virtual Dub and Media Coder FOR PC, ffmpegX for Mac, Gtranscode
>>> for GNU/Linux and mencoder also for GNU/Linux.
>>>
>>> Video compression terminology needs some understanding. It has
>>> various standards -- MPEG1, MPEG2, H.264 (which are mostly rules set by
>>> Motion Pictures Experts Group).
>>>
>>>
>>> Compression formats or containers have file-endings like .avi, .mpg,
>>> .mov, or .ogg. These are the wrapper for the audio/video information.
>>>
>>>
>>> CodecS -- the algorithm for compressing and decompressing -- include
>>> the video codecs Theora, XviD AND Sorenson 3 and the audio codecs AAC
>>> or lame MP3.
>>>
>>> There are a number of software players for video files. One which is
>>> attracting the most attention nowadays is VLC. This is free software
>>> and open source-based and also cross-platform so will work on Mac, PC
>>> and GNU/Linux But there are also others like Democracy, Mplayer,
>>> Quicktime, Flash, Windows Media or Real Media.
>>>
>>>
>>> Browser plugins that enable you to watch video in Firefox or Internet
>>>  Explorer include VLC, Cortado java applet, Quicktime, Flash, Windows
>>>  Media and Real Media.
>>>
>>>
>>> Your video settings depend on the screening quality required. You
>>> could opt for the .avi format and the XviD codec TO enable your
>>> audience to download a decent copy to screen on a TV or in a cinema.
>>> For web-streaming, the .mov (QT progressive) format is suitable
>>> together with the Sorensen 3 codec.
>>>
>>> For video screening quality, you need a data rate of approximiately
>>> 1200 kbits/sec, and the resolution should be either PAL or NTSC,
>>> whichever was the original format. Web streaming comes out good enough
>>>  if you have a data rate of 128-300 kbits/sec, with a resolution of
>>> 320x240.
>>>
>>>
>>> For audio settings (screening quality), use a data rate of 128
>>> kbits/sec, with the codec of Lame .mp3. Web streaming suffices with
>>> around 64 kbits/sec and a codec of Lame .mp3.
>>>
>>> How does one test whether a file would work?
>>>
>>>
>>> Says Anna: "Test your compression settings by outputting a 30
>>> second clip of your movie first. Try different settings until you get
>>> the result you want. Try videohelp.com for more info or the Guide to
>>> Digital Video Distribution and tutorials available on
>>> www.engagemedia.org"
>>>
>>> There is a new documentation project being set up to aid video
>>> makers in the use of FLOSS video tools by the Transmission Network, a
>>> collaboration between www.ourvideo.org and www.flossmanuals.org.
>>> Check
>>> these sites for details.
>>>
>>> --
>>> FN: Frederick Noronha
>>> Phone 0091-832-2409490
>>> http://wikiwikiweb.de/MyContacts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
>>> #  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
>>> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
>>> #  more info: majordomo at bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg
>>> body #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime at bbs.thing.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> blog: http://deletetheborder.org/lotu5
>>>
>>>
>>> gpg:  0x5B459C11 // encrypted email preferred
>>> gaim: djlotu5 // off the record messaging preferred
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> imc-video mailing list imc-video at lists.indymedia.org
>>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-video
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> blog: http://deletetheborder.org/lotu5
>
>
> gpg:  0x5B459C11 // encrypted email preferred
> gaim: djlotu5 // off the record messaging preferred
> _______________________________________________
> imc-video mailing list imc-video at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-video
>
>