[IMC-Video] [transmission-discuss] Plumi

[harcesz]

i guess that the logicall way to do this would be first decide on the shape
of video indymedia and why didnt the las one work and then decide on the CMS
depending on what the collective wants to use the site for, not the other
way around.

harcesz

On Nov 8, 2007 5:24 PM, mark burdett <mark at indymedia.org> wrote:

> I think this sounds right.. i certainly know a lot of python hackers,
> if we want to setup a plone/plumi site we could hopefully recruit some.
> I'd vote for plone since it's something i dont have much experience
> with, so i can leave all the heavy lifting to someone else ;)
> I could help a little around the edges.
>
> anyways first we need to be a little more clear about what we're
> trying to do..
>
> --mark
>
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:29:15 +1000, anna wrote:
> > Hi Mick,
> >
> > I guess the way I see it (and I can't speak for the EngageMedia
> > collective here, just my opinion) our role in supporting a
> > video.indymedia.org site using Plumi would be to continue to maintain
> > and coordinate the software as we are now and continue to be the major
> > contributors to its development.
> >
> > I don't think a video.indymedia.org built on Plumi would be viable
> > unless another collective emerged who wished to build it. Such a group
> > would have a lot of support from ourselves and the growing Plumi
> > developer community in terms of development of the Plumi code and
> > advice, but would have to be able to customise the software themselves
> > to create the site (and content development, project management).
> >
> > There are potentially developers out there with the skills to make this
> > happen, but you might have to broaden the search a little wider than
> > existing IMC developers who seem to mainly use PHP rather than Python /
> > Zope / Plone.
> >
> > I think it would be counter-productive for us to pitch in with more
> > support than this at this stage, as it would not be something we could
> > sustain into the future given our own workloads with EngageMedia.org /
> > Plumi and I wouldn't want to see the project fail when we withdrew our
> > initial support.
> >
> > So in some ways I think Drupal is a better choice as there appears to be
> > more developers familiar with this platform in Indymedia circles. On the
> > other hand I think Plumi is a powerful platform and is ready to go now
> > with minimal customisation to create a publishing site. It could be
> > expanded in terms of aggregation also, though inbound RSS feeds have not
> > been a strong point in Plone to date there are apparently big
> > improvements here in Plone 3 and new products (modules) for Plone 3.
> >
> > It really depends on what kind of site video.indymedia.org should be. I
> > think simply a big aggregation site bringing in feeds or content within
> > feeds tagged "indymedia" could be the most successful idea and if so you
> > wouldn't pick Plone to build that on unless your developers were in love
> > with it :)
> >
> > I guess a wiki page speccing out what people want to build, and the
> > roles required to fill to make that happen would be a good start. Of
> > course, what can be built will depend upon the skills and resources
> > available.
> >
> > Just my thoughts for now..
> > Cheers
> > Anna
> >
> >
> > Mick Fuzz wrote:
> > >> We only released the 0.1-final version of the Plumi
> > >> video-sharing
> > >> package for Plone in September, so it's very early
> > >> days. We're starting
> > >> to have other developers from outside the
> > >> EngageMedia collective
> > >> contribute substantially to Plumi now, which is a
> > >> good sign for the
> > >> health of the project.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hi Anna,
> > >
> > > If people from imc-video did decide to go with Plumi
> > > for a Video upload site for video.indymedia.org - how
> > > do you see it working?
> > >
> > > Do you think there are enough people with the skills
> > > and time to set up and administer a plumi site along
> > > the existing lines of indymedia sites - ie volunteer
> > > run - and finding a suitable server.
> > >
> > > To put in my 2 cents, i'd be pretty happy to see a
> > > plumi video.indymedia.org upload and distribution site
> > > - as you guys have done so much hard work.
> > >
> > > Reading back thought the archives, there is also a
> > > point from Ben, who says that video.indymedia.org
> > > should be the mother of all aggregation sites. I'm
> > > very much into that idea and think drupal could work
> > > well for this aspect of the site but there is some
> > > coding to be done there.
> > >
> > > Both Mark Burdett and Anna have made moves to
> > > compiling a source of sites with good Media RSS feeds.
> > >
> > >
> > > Mark is maintaining one here
> > > https://contact.indymedia.org/xml_table.php?id_medium=5
> > >
> > > And one is being compiled for the transmission network
> > > - i don't know how best to ask people to feed into
> > > that. Maybe email me and i'll put it on the wiki
> > > http://wiki.transmission.cc/index.php/TransmissionMiroPlayer
> > >
> > > I guess it would be good to pool resources on this
> > > aspect.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------o)------------------
> > > http://www.mutantmedia.org.uk  -  crazy freaks loverble geeks
> > > http://www.basslinecircus.org - genetically modified circus
> > >
> > > phone: 07913 882193
> > > email : mick at mutantmedia.org.uk
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > imc-video mailing list
> > imc-video at lists.indymedia.org
> > http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-video
> _______________________________________________
> Transmission-discuss mailing list
> Transmission-discuss at lists.transmission.cc
> http://lists.transmission.cc/listinfo/transmission-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-video/attachments/20071108/e40a8d62/attachment.htm