[IMC-Video] on plone and pumi

[lotu5]

Ok, I tried to setup the plumi "sandbox" again last night on the 
borderlands hacklab server, but the plumi install is trickier than i 
thought.

i have zope instaled and running, and I can go to ourserver:8080/manager

and see the nice three frame interface, which I'm assuming is the ZMI, 
but I don't see the "quick product install" part where I can install the 
plumi products. also, from the plumi documentation, it says to pick 3 
products, atvideo, plumiskin and pressroom but i only see pumiskin, and 
i just downloaded the latest plumi, unziped it and added its dir to the 
plone.conf and restarted plone.

can someome give me some direction here for setting up plumi?

when i go into the manager interface and try to pick a plone page, i 
jsut get a page of code starting with

('No traversable adapter found', {u'content': [('version', '1.6'), 
('mode', 'html'), ('setPosition', (99, 16)), ('setSourceFile',

i gather that the plone install isn't quite complete yet. i guess i'll 
start poring over the plone manual.

thanks!

   lotu5


anna wrote:
> FYI Plone has been used to date for some very high-traffic sites.
> 
> Here's some lists courtesy of google:
> 
> http://plone.org/news/share-your-enterprise-plone-deployment-story-win-an-ipod 
> (finalists listed in comments)
> http://plone.net/sites (erghhh... the C.I.A. is on the list!!! bloody 
> GPL, anybody can use it ;) now there's an argument for proprietary software)
> 
> We use Squid for caching of EngageMedia.org. Can't tell you much more 
> than that, our programmers could. Plone is nonetheless taxing on a 
> server, it's true. We've made some big performance improvements on 
> Plumi, and will be making one more major improvement before the next 
> release (0.2).
> 
> Good thing to keep in mind though, and important area for development no 
> matter which CMS is used.
> 
> ourmedia.org runs Drupal, no? fairly comparable to video.indymedia 
> traffic I would have thought... could be wrong, just an assumption I am 
> making.
> 
> I don't personally see the need for 2 video.indymedia projects - one for 
> FTP and one for the "video-sharing experience", I think a good system 
> can do both. Plumi is designed for web-viewing *and* download of videos 
> for screening. Sorry I am probably just misunderstanding here - Schock 
> did you suggest 2 systems? Or did you just mean we should get IVDN back 
> up in order to have that content live again, before some kind of 
> migration is worked out to the new database, whatever that will be? That 
> seems to make sense to me.
> 
> Perhaps rather than migrating, the old database and data could remain as 
> is, but have the Search function work across both databases.. at least 
> until there seems to be enough resources around to attempt a migration.
> 
> Also, EngageMedia.org is not a sandbox ;) it is a working example of 
> Plumi, but a real sandbox installation for Indymedia would involve 
> testing out making customisations such as anonymous posting (which I 
> would have thought was pretty damn easy to set up - Plone has well 
> developed Roles and Workflows that would just need a bit of 
> customisation.. here's a HowTo 
> http://plone.org/documentation/how-to/allowing-anonymous-users-to-add-content)
> 
> Cheers
> Anna
> _______________________________________________
> imc-video mailing list
> imc-video at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-video
> 


-- 

blog: http://technotrannyslut.com
gpg:  0x5B77079C // encrypted email preferred
gaim/skype: djlotu5 // off the record messaging preferred