[IMC-Video] high-traffic etc.

[lotu5]

So what can we do to get video.indy back up? We just need more hosting 
for the videos?

Occam wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>> http://plone.org/news/share-your-enterprise-plone-deployment-story-win-an-ipod
>> (finalists listed in comments)
>> http://plone.net/sites (erghhh... the C.I.A. is on the list!!! bloody
>> GPL, anybody can use it ;) now there's an argument for proprietary software)
>>
>> We use Squid for caching of EngageMedia.org. Can't tell you much more
>> than that, our programmers could. Plone is nonetheless taxing on a
>> server, it's true. We've made some big performance improvements on
>> Plumi, and will be making one more major improvement before the next
>> release (0.2).
> 
> Well, the main point is that plone needs allot more resources then we
> have in the network. We have slow server with few memory. Also, these
> $bigcompanys with allot of money have much more possibilities to have
> a bigger server setup in one rack with the database seperated, etc pp.
> 
> They are able to run a fast plone site because they can buy the
> hardware for a big setup.
> 
> bolobolo, the machine where video.indy is running at the moment looks like this.
> 
> Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
> 512MB RAM
> 158G Diskspace for the Videos
> 2Mbit Inet
> 
> There is no way to run plone on this box...
> 


-- 

blog: http://technotrannyslut.com
gpg:  0x5B77079C // encrypted email preferred
gaim/skype: djlotu5 // off the record messaging preferred