[IMC-Video] [Fwd: Re: jilt's proposal]

[rafael2k]

hi all!

> > Have you heard off transmission.cc? If not, you should check it out as
> > a lot of work is being done in the directions you speak of and it
> > would make sense to collaborate rather than duplicate.
> >
> > A couple of comments from me.
> >
> > Documentation...
> > I did quite a bit of work doing documentation on video.indymedia.org
> > and on the imc uk video projects pages. A lot of work is now being
> > done via Transmission on documentation using floss manuals. Personally
> > I don't think the effort yields much as nobody every seems to have
> > heard of or found such documentation themselves.
>
> Current Open source video editing is too complex and buggy - we need
> something much simpler/functional if anyone is going to use it.

what?
did you ever tried cinelerra?
here in cmi-brasil, we at campinas and goiania use cinelerra all the time, 
pretty easily.
I started a howto:
https://docs.indymedia.org/view/Sysadmin/Cinelerra

> we need (:
> > Collaborative and Online Video Editing
> > Been to international gathering of video activists over the last four
> > or five years and this often comes up. I have seen projects such as
> > Tapestry demonstrated and been excited by some of the potential but
> > ultimately I don't see the point. People generally don't collaborate
> > on video editing and there are major security issues with online
> > footage sharing. While available bandwidth has increased massively
> > over the last few years it's not realistic to work with uncompressed
> > DV footage online and anything else will require post compression and
> > therefore time and processing power which will put people off
> > unloading. Personally I really don't see this as a worthwhile place to
> > put effort.

have you ever tried using the .xml of cinelerra in a svn repository, and the 
dv files shared for all people doing the video edition?

> > Collaboration works to some degree in the live face to face
> > environment of a convergence centre but beyond that it breaks down.
>
> I agree with Ben here wholeheartedly having been involved in setting up
> a number of such projects - the bigist one the European Newsreal which
> died a long death with this very thing on its lips... editing is a
> individual thing - most big co-operative edits are made of lots of
> individual segments which are put together by a few individuals thus the
> "co-operation" is always limited.
>
> > My view is that distribution is key. We don't really have a problem
> > making videos, we have a problem getting them out of the ghetto and
> > giving them the audience they deserve while people are moving away
> > from TV and the broadcast model and have less and less time or
> > attention span yet greater and greater demand from a wider and wider
> > variety of video producers and distribution services. I think mobile
> > and streaming content is key and will be more and more important in
> > coming years and indymedia hasn't even got the basics yet.

may be broacast w/ ours transmitters:
http://wwvince.interfree.it/PellegriniBacciLuise_WSR08_CR.pdf


-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Ciência da Computação @  Unicamp
Rádio Muda, radiolivre.org, TV Piolho, tvlivre.org, www.midiaindependente.org
Chave PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2FF86098
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-

-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo n?o texto foi limpo...
Nome  : n?o dispon?vel
Tipo  : application/pgp-signature
Tam   : 197 bytes
Descr.: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url   : http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-video/attachments/20080509/2542e78b/attachment.pgp