[imc-italy] c'è chi sta peggio di noi...

[obaz]

Wu Ming 63 wrote:
> 2006/1/3, mina <mina at inventati.org>:
>>
>> per me ok per il testo ma aggiungerei una domanda su come sono giunti a
>> pubblicare questa cosa e come funziona il loro process.
>> m

ho aggiunto solo qualche correzione all'inglese. per me il contenuto e' ok.

> 
> Hi dear indy-sydney people.
> We write to you just to say we were "surprised" reading the feature you
> produced in your homepage the last 31st of december.
> It was really shocking for us to see published as a feature a text that
> summarizes in a few rows all the neonazi, christian and heavy-conservative
> thinking.
> We can't believe a media that considers itself as "alternative" can affirm
> that euthanasia, war, abortion and capital punshment are parts of the same
> "culture of violence".
> That is not alternative information. That is just disinformation.
> We think that pro-choice, pro-abortion and pro-RU485 movements have a solid
> base, as every movement that promotes freedom and new rights. On the other
> hand, we think that an alternative media, as Indymedia is, could play a part
> in informing people about these subjects and about the industrial
> interests hidden behind some pro-choice advocates.
> All that said, we hope that Indymedia Sydney will delete that feature the
> way it is now.
> In the end, we would like to know something more about the process you use to publish
> your features, as we understand that it is different (and quite interesting, in
> some ways) from ours (i.e. newswire articles that become features).
> 
> The Indymedia Italy Team