[Listwork] namespace for non-imc ?

[ana]

I am not sure if chrisc is thinking of collectives that are already 
operating as an imc node of another imc, e.g. in uk there are 
collectives that have been accepted by the uk network, not through the 
formal new-imc process. I think those should stay as they are 
(imc-london, e.g.) or else send this discussion to imc-process,

I think this discussion should be about new collectives newly asking for 
a list, without having to rename lists already created... then when the 
collective gets recognised through new imc process, then either change 
the list name or 'migrate' to another list...

not sure if this work is necessary, taking into account that finding out 
would possibly mean a good amount of works time...

my two cents

ana

chrisc at indymedia.org wrote:

>Hi
>
>That makes sense to me since it prevents the need to
>rename lists... 
>
>But I'm not sure how best to flag up the status of lists
>belonging to collectives that have been through the
>new-imc process and ones that haven't... 
>
>Chris
>_______________________________________________
>listwork mailing list
>listwork at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/listwork
>
>  
>

-- 
ana. uk. london.
www.indymedia.org.uk
--------------
public key/llave publica:
http://docs.indymedia.org/twiki/pub/Main/AnaPena/anita.asc