[New-imc] BLOCK: non-imc's should not sponsor new collectives(Official Response)

ana anap at indymedia.org
Sun Feb 27 18:58:59 PST 2005


i agree.

ana

Jay wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> While I agree with the idea of making sure the new-imc working group 
> list is populated by people who are actively interested in the work 
> we're doing here (I like the idea of regular roll calls, though I hate 
> the world "purge" :))), I disagree with the strict concept that only 
> people who are currently active in local IMCs should be able to 
> participate in that work.
>
> Yes, I believe that new-imc volunteers should have active experience 
> working in their local IMCs.  I can't imagine how someone would be 
> able to really help a group through the new-imc process without an 
> understanding of what s/he is helping them towards.  I agree that the 
> new-imc group should prioritize sponsors who are currently active in 
> local IMCs.
>
> However, there are also some people who want to participate in the 
> working group who have been involved with local IMCs in the past and 
> have helped new-imcs through the process but aren't currently involved 
> with a local IMC.  This may be because the person in question has 
> moved to a new city and hasn't gotten involved locally yet or is 
> working/studying/temporarily living in a place where there's not yet 
> an IMC.  For a long while, before I moved to Philadelphia, I lived in 
> a place where there was not, and still is not, a local IMC, but I 
> still felt able to be involved in global IMC organizing.  So perhaps 
> I'm a bit sensitive to this.
>
> As for Deja specifically, he has been involved with the new-imc 
> working group for a long time, has worked with his own local IMCs in 
> Victoria and BC and has helped several IMCs into the network.  The 
> situation around the Kamloops application was not a positive one for 
> many reasons and there are obviously still bad feelings.   Also, to 
> put it mildly, there is a "diversity of opinions" within the working 
> group about some of the most basic things that go into a local IMC.  I 
> don't think that kind of disagreement, in and of itself, is a bad 
> thing.  Disagreements over what makes a local IMC viable will keep us, 
> as a working group, on our toes.
>
> My feeling is that if Deja is familiar with the organizers of an 
> aspiring IMC in western Canada he is in a better position than any of 
> us to help him through the process.  We will all be here watching the 
> e-mails come through the new-imc list regarding all new IMCs, so as 
> long as our list organizers maintain transparency we should be able to 
> keep up to date with one another.  And, especially because we're 
> wanting for volunteers, I think we should find a way to be as 
> welcoming as possible to anyone who wants to participate.
>
>  My two and a half cents,
> Jay
>
> At 2/25/2005, Deja wrote:
>
>> clara wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>> i raised my objections earlier, but since there was now reaction, I 
>>> hereby
>>> want to phrase this as an official block.
>>>
>>>
>>> I hereby block Deja as a sponsor for new imcs.
>>>
>> Point of Protocol : Proposals are things that can be blocked. My 
>> decision was to act in accordance with my duties, duties that I was 
>> asked by this list to take on and have acted on for three years now. 
>> The proposal can be seen here: 
>> http://archives.lists.indymedia.org/new-imc/2001-November/001263.html
>> My reponse to Jays request:
>> http://archives.lists.indymedia.org/new-imc/2001-November/001265.html
>>
>> Clara is not so clearly making a proposal here. This proposal is to 
>> 'fire' me as a volunteer on this list. Clara herself was not a member 
>> of her local collective for a time, and used the questionable (and 
>> clearly not local) bio-tech imc as her validation for being involved 
>> at the global level.
>>
>>> Deja from Kamloops is from a group that have decided to stop their own
>>> application as an IMC a couple of months ago (even though he uses 
>>> the term
>>> "IMC Kamloops").
>>>
>> I am also a member of the Victoria and BC IMC collectives and have at 
>> times also worked with the Vancouver and Alberta collectives. As I 
>> said earlier, I am more than willing to 'prove' this to you by asking 
>> members of those collectives to write here and verify that fact.
>> Somehow this provoked accusations that I intended to 'Spam' this list 
>> and that I was engaging in 'moral blackmail' and to a further 
>> proposal that this list be moderated. I will respond to that proposal 
>> in a seperate email.
>>
>>> New-imc is a working group to help new collectives to join the 
>>> Indymedia
>>> network. This cannot be done by groups or individuals who have 
>>> decided not
>>> to be part of the Indymedia network.
>>>
>>>
>> I have never decided to disaffilate myself from the network. If I 
>> had, I would have unsubscribed from this list and imc-communication. 
>> Our application has been withdrawn, not closed. Mike Rosenberg is the 
>> liason and is aware of the status of the application, Clara is not in 
>> a postition to comment on this.
>>
>>> I think everything else would be unfair to the collective that is 
>>> starting.
>>>
>> So to clarify. It seems that Clara is proposing that people who are 
>> not members of local collectives should not be allowed to sponsor IMC's.
>>
>> As a standing member of this list since 2001, I block this proposal.
>>
>> This is not an attempt to make the network work better, it is a 
>> vindictive attack against an individual on this list designed to 
>> silence dissent. It is clearly against the the values of this network 
>> to censor, silence or attempt to marginalize dissent or make it 
>> illegal in any way. I have a right to express my resistance against 
>> those who would attempt to place undue restraints on the autonomous 
>> collectives in this network or thier memberships. I will continue to 
>> do so.
>>
>> Silence is Defeat
>>
>> Deja
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
>> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
>

-- 
ana. uk. london
----------------
http://www.indymedia.org.uk
http://aktivix.org
http://www.hacklabs.org




More information about the New-imc mailing list