[New-imc] disagreeing with petros on new-darwin-imc

[Petros Evdokas]

boud wrote:
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2006-July/0731-89.html

nick wrote:
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2006-July/0731-az.html



Hello again,

I appreciate that we have differing views on the Darwin issue, that is 
why we agreed that the best way to work on the problem is to deal with 
it as a split. It's a solution which will enable the repair work because 
the groups involved will have a shape (context) guiding the work.

Getting stuck on our varying analyses and perceptions of the conflict's 
history, or trying to convince everyone in the network of each of the 
current views is not going to solve anything - passions are already too 
heated for that, and positions entrenched. For example, we all agreed 
that imc-darwin was never dissafiliated, but also that the only way we 
can help both the groups resulting from the split is to pass them 
through new-imc procedures.

That is why I wrote this:
"[imc-darwin] Steps to moving forward"
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-darwin/2006-June/0612-7l.html

Most of it still valid. The only responses I got are "fuck you", but 
that's the reality of new-imc procedures: nothing is going to move 
forward in that direction, until the interested parties take steps to 
notice, aknowledge and engage.

Thanks again for clarifying thougths and positions, it's the best way to 
make the work smooth,
Petros
___________