[New-imc] [Imc-arafura] arafura and darwin

[Petros Evdokas]

Cameron Gregg wrote:

> Petros. No.
> 
> For a start, it was me, and Sydney Indy that supported ("main backer") 
> Arafura, not melbourne.
> 
> Secondly, I think its a bit much to accuse arafura of instigating all 
> this straight after they have passed a proposal not to block darwin.
> 
> It was melbourne who initiated the darwin disaffiliation proposal. They 
> did it off their own bat, for their own reasons. They are not controlled 
> by Arafura.
> 
> Can you please do some research before you go off on rants like this and 
> also back up your claims with proof.
> 
> You have just slandered Arafura IMC.
> 
> Cam
> Sydney Indymedia Volunteer
> Sponsoring Arafura for the New-imc process.

Cameron,

Thank you for clarifying which of the locals is related to what. I
appreciate that.

It would be very helpful if an actual member of the Arafura candidate
group (not a member of another distant imc local) can say this in their
own words, from their own email account:
"We, as a group, (or "I, as a member of the Arafura group") do not
support the current initiative from Melbourne."

It would be very much appreciated by all of us in indymedia, it would be
a very significant contribution to a future peaceful settlement in the
region.

I look forward to your helpful clarifications, and I really appreciate
it this kind of correcting me and setting the record straight.

Thanks,
Petros
new-imc volunteer
___________