[New-imc] extending the proposal's deadline to Sep. 2 / Re: EMERGENCY PROPOSAL - please respond by Sep. 1 2006 / Re: arafura and darwin
john at johnmilton.ca
Sun Sep 3 06:52:58 PDT 2006
Sorry folks if my wording a few posts back was unclear when I said:
"I continue to stand opposed to the disaffiliation proposal, both as
originally proposed, and as amended."
As 2.3 from this list is silent on the question of disaffiliation itself
it is by implication in support of it insofar as it does not stand in
the way of it happening, and as such I do not support sending it to imc
It was 2.3 I was refering to when I said "and as amended." but I should
have been more explicit about that.
> If we want to send a text to imc-process from new-imc, we need to converge
> on the precise statement we make.
> petros (and anyone else) - do you wish to support version 2.3 of the proposed
> statement by new-imc to imc-process?
> nick wrote:
>>supporting proposal 2.3: Nick, boud, Smush
>>supporting Melbourne proposal: Ulla
>>opposing Melbourne proposal: John, Petros
> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
Peace: John Milton
email: john at johnmilton.ca
mobile (Canada): 905-537-8472
Encrypted email welcome. PGP key on my website
Fingerprint: 40D8 5835 7230 8EE1 E968 1E7A 5CF1 68A6 C0E2 F9DC
Koan for our times: "Are we smarter than yeast?"
More information about the New-imc