[New-imc] version 0.4: PROPOSAL (DISCUSSION phase) - new-imc statement to imc-process
and at axxs.org
Mon Sep 11 06:20:09 PDT 2006
On 11/09/2006, at 2:22 PM, Petros Evdokas wrote:
> Please give consideration to these:
> boud wrote:
>> Given that no proposal is presently waiting for approval in imc-
>> it would serve to:
>> (2) start to heal the relation between new-imc and IMC Melbourne by
>> making it clear that new-imc does not wish to override any
>> by local collectives
> and wrote:
>> Speaking in a personal capacity I don't see that there is anything to
>> heal with new-imc.
>> Can someone tell me what needs to be healed? As have stated I don't
>> think Melbourne has a problem with new-imc....
> ------- end of quoted segments -----
> I really do appreciate that Boud raised this concern, and that And
> to it, clarifying there is nothing to heal.
> And we still all agree that some kind of statement from new-imc
> might be
> helpful, though it is not needed by any particular process right
> now in
> any pressing way. Is that correct?
I think the issue is still pressing, putting it off isn't going to
deal with the problem, it will more than likely just dissipate
energy. I think new-imc has a responsibility to respond to concerns
of IMCs in a timely manner, especially as Melbourne is currently not
making any revised proposals in an effort to give new-imc the chance
to communicate it's understanding of the situation to the network. No
one has proposed a specific deadline but the quicker it is clarified
the sooner we can all move on. I'd suggest early next week would be
> Are these comfortable for us to include in our orientation for the
> I'd like that if it works for all of us.
> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
More information about the New-imc