[New-imc] on the issue of the statement on darwin and arafura, usage of the word "split"

[Petros Evdokas]

boud at riseup.net wrote:


> Well, i have no idea whether the SF split was mostly due to local
> factors or external pressures. i still don't understand how "split"
> is a worldview, except as what seems to me to be an objective way
> of describing what happened. It's not a *complete* way of describing
> the events - which is maybe what you are uncomfortable with?

Thanks for addressing this Boud. I don't seek to convince anyone, but 
only to add transparency to the dialogue. What I wrote earlier was one 
way for me to be extending more about my orientation, so that our work 
can be more easily placed on the landscape among the many and various 
views on the issues.

Also, there's no real need to go into details,  or to discuss finding a 
complete way of describing what happened in and around Darwin, but if 
you think it's necessary, I'm open to it. Perhaps after we finish with 
this leg of statement building, so as to avoid more tensions.

Thanks,
Petros
________