[New-imc] DRAFT 1.0

[Petros Evdokas]

Thanks to you all for the proposals and editing work, starting with 
Nick's and then further corrections and then refinements from Boud and John.

So, versions .7, .8, .9. and 1.0 more or less express me, EXCEPT the 
phrase "be considered affiliated". It occurs in our latest version on 
paragraph 5.

I propose we remove it and send all the rest since we agree (I think) on 
all the rest (please correct me if I'm wrong).


I believe that the phrase in question (status of the groups) is outside 
the jurisdiction of the new-imc group, and that jurisdiction rests only 
with imc-process at the momement. And we (new-imc) have not yet 
completed the work with each of the two candidate groups to determine 
where they stand.

Can we get an aknowledgement on the things we agree so far? Is my 
understanding of what we agree correct?

Petros
________