[New-imc] [imc-commwork] citieslist

[joe ttx]

hello alster, new-imc, imc-commwork


Le 21-oct.-07 à 21:23, Alster a écrit :

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi Joe!
>
> joe ttx wrote:
>> I'm joe from new-imc. After some reflexions on new-imc, we think that
>> it would be reagent
>> that they are the new-imc volonteers who upgrade the citieslist.
>
> Are you saying that new-imc has decided that new-imc are (exclusively)
> going to upgrade the cities list on contact.indymedia.org in the  
> future?

no no, I m just involved to the new-imc group and i see often a long  
delay between the integration of some imcs and the integration in the  
citieslist

>
> I imagine IMC Commwork would appreciate this. However, it should be
> noted that having a superuser account (so you can edit other IMCs)  
> also
> comes with a certain degree of responsibility (and new-imcers already
> have a lot), and the more superuser accounts are there the higher  
> is the
> chance one of their passwords is leaked.

yes, the concentration of the responsibilities is not always a good  
idea. Perhaps I do not include/understand very well the  
responsibility for a superuser

>
> For the purpose of our information, can you point us to the public
> mailing list archives where new-imc's discussion on such matters has
> taken place and the decision was taken?

is not a decision, just a discussion (to which I was not)

boud say : (…) As for the proposed themes: i think many of your  
questions are to do
with our contact database contact.indymedia.org, and it would make
most sense to discuss it with people from imc-commwork. If we had more
people working on the contact database software, and more new-imc
people updating the database (e.g. we could consider all old
applications older than 1 year, where we've heard nothing from them
for 1 year, as being closed), then i think that might help partly with
some of these problems.  When/if i have time, i will volunteer some
time. (…)

http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2007-September/0921-1g.html

I decided to take a little my time after this reading for upgrading  
this citieslist


I see that boud transform my personal request to imc-commwork into a  
collective decision on
New-imc.
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2007-October/1021-68.html

(Perhaps my error was to make a copy of my mall to new-imc ? Oo)

When, in my request, i said "i'm from new-imc", it was like a kidly  
roll call' for imc-commwork, not less, not more. (awkward perhaps)


I agree with ana http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2007- 
October/1021-bo.html
and anarco babe http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2007- 
October/1022-yb.html

it is better to invold myself "formally" in imc-commwork, which I  
will do soon


…

joe

(sorry for this silly english, but i think understanding english  
correctly)