[New-imc] moderation

[Damian Gerow]

nick wrote:
: Bart's proposal:
: 
: > if help is needed moderating this list, I can spare some time for it.
: 
: asks if help is needed.  Does anyone feel that help is needed?  Are
: the current admins handling everything to everyone's satisfaction?  If
: so, I suggest that Bart put his energies elsewhere. I suspect that we
: need more help getting new collectives through the process of joining
: the network than we do administrating this list.

(en)
I think the distinction made between list *moderation* and list
*administration* is an important one.  Administration is easy, and that
seems to be getting done quite well.  I haven't been doing list
*moderation*, because not every new-imc@ message reaches me, for reasons I
haven't had time to look into.  For example, I'm seeing this conversation,
but it's the first new-imc@ post I've seen in probably about two months.

So, I'll ask the question again, with a clearer definition of "moderation",
and slightly less weighted (my apologies for the initial question):

Is there room for improvement with regards to the current status of list
moderation?

Would adding another person assist in ameliorating list moderation?

(fr)

(Je m'excuse pour mon francais.  J'ai l'impression que je devrais utiliser Google
pour la translation.)

Je pense que la distinction faite entre le *modération* et
*l'administration* est importante.  L'administration, c'est simple, et j'ai
l'impression q'on le fait.  Moi, je n'ai jamais fait le moderation, car je ne
recois pas tous les messages envoye a la liste, et je n'avais pas le temps
pour l'investigation.  Ce conversation, c'est le premier que j'ai vu il y a
environ deux mois.

Donc, je vais reposer la question, maintenant q'on a une definition de
'moderation':

Y'a t-il besion d'un effort d'ameliorer la moderation pour new-imc@?

Est-ce q'on va l'ameliorer par l'addition d'une autre 'moderateur'?