[New-imc] [IMC-Process] Online form: Proposed new IMC! (И н д и м е д и а -Ю Г )

akop38 akop38 at riseup.net
Thu May 8 12:41:01 PDT 2008


  Ok, i just asked it as i'm a new-one and i'd like to get info about  
the "system of work". So, i understood that it is sll up to me, so  
i'll take process on my own.
Then send some collection of information to this list.

Only one think - i'd like you to come to irc chat, when the time  
comes, and all you, to ask questions to kethers group=)

Well! Thanks! I'll connect to kether and collective of yug tomorrow.





> hi akop
>
> On Thu, 8 May 2008, akop38 wrote:
>
>> Ok! I know this man, and i was helping him with teh. part of site,  
>> and
>> consualt him about IMC policy.
>> I'll guide YUG (in russian it means "south"=)
>
> :) Like Yugoslavia before NATO bombed it...
>
>>
>> Should i mail and talk exactly to him, or use this subscription?
>>
>
> i think you mean "should you email privately or on this mailing list?"
> That's up to you to choose. There's a long page
>
> https://docs.indymedia.org/view/Global/NewImcHowHelpUs
>
> for new-imc helpers. It's old and long, but maybe it will help.
>
>
> My suggestion is that the organising process and your contacts should
> best be public. At least in the relatively-less-repressive countries
> that seems best. But in Russia that can be dangerous if people do not
> know and use basic internet security methods.  You know the situation
> better than i do, and how much transparency and openness is possible.
>
>
>> So, i have to do all that you (Boud) did for IMC-Piter collective  
>> (can
>> i use that expirience as guiding plan), yes?
>
> The IMC network is non-authoritarian :) and tries to function by  
> consensus. So:
>
> If you think what i did for IMC Piter was good and consistent with the
> consensus of the network, then probably you should give the same  
> type of
> help.
>
> If you think what i did for IMC Piter was *not* consistent with the
> consensus of the network, then do something different, which you think
> will be acceptable by the network.
>
>
>> Sorry for stupid questions, but i'm a new-one as imc-helper, so i  
>> have
>> to know, that i do everything correct.
>
> What i just said is serious: we really don't know what is "correct" as
> a socially just, and also efficient and systematic way to run our
> network. So far we have some ideas and experience and hope that they
> are useful to others. A lot (but not all) of these ideas and
> experiences are written on the twiki (mostly in English only, sorry).
>
>
> Think of it as Sartrean existentialism. There's no "God" out there to
> decide for you, there is only Google - see
> http://www.thechurchofgoogle.org/ - if you ask Her a question (pray to
> Her), then She will immediately give you ten answers.
>
>
> pozdr
> boud
>
>



More information about the New-imc mailing list