[www-features] URGENT UPDATE: Sergey Atroschenkov not killed

[boud]

hi suzq, www-features,

On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, SuZQ wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Our indymedia article in the "read more" section states prominently that
> Sergey Atroschenkov was killed.  This is the most recent news that I have:
>
> "One of them was in an extremely grave condition, and eyewitnesses thought
> he had been killed (Sergey Atroshchenkov). It was found out later that
> fortunately he is still alive, but doctors at the hospital have refuse to
> give any information regarding his condition."

It's a citation from IMC Belarus:
http://belarus.indymedia.ru/3781

> If he hasn't died in the hospital since Saturday, we should update that
> ASAP.  I've already posted a comment, but since it's stated so prominently
> in the article, the correction should be made to the article itself.
>
> THANKS VERY MUCH!

i don't quite understand - the present article says nothing about 
Atroshchenko(v).

There is a prominent *comment* (first comment) including photos, but
nothing in the article itself. Maybe it's because the article has no
content, only an abstract, that the comment looks like it's part of
the article.

i don't know what the www-features culture is for minor editorial
interventions, but i presume we could add to the end of the comment
something like

[EDITORIAL INTERVENTION: AS OF 26/3/2006, ATROSHCHENKO(V) WAS BADLY
WOUNDED, BUT IN HOSPITAL AND STILL ALIVE.]

Anyone against?

pozdr
boud